|
Post by aubrey on Dec 4, 2017 17:54:38 GMT
That was Govt policy, not a science law.
|
|
jean
Madrigal Member
Posts: 8,546
|
Post by jean on Dec 4, 2017 18:07:45 GMT
Without knowing the comparative costs you are expressing an opinion, not a fact. Well, we do know, as it happens - the figures for the particular example I cited are in the article I linked to , if you care to read it. In the real world, that's exactly what the Northumbria Healthcare Foundation Trust eventually did.
|
|
jean
Madrigal Member
Posts: 8,546
|
Post by jean on Dec 4, 2017 18:16:10 GMT
That was Govt policy, not a science law. How strange it is that exco is in this one particular so anxious to defend the policies of New Labour, whose defeat he elsewhere celebrates with such glee!
|
|
|
Post by aqua on Dec 4, 2017 18:35:03 GMT
It was Prescott's law, wasn't it?
I bet he regrets it now.
|
|
jean
Madrigal Member
Posts: 8,546
|
Post by jean on Dec 4, 2017 18:54:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by aqua on Dec 4, 2017 19:06:30 GMT
Thanks.
I was alluding to the role Prescott assumed as Promoter and Enforcer of Blair policies which they knew the Left would object to. Who better than Two-Jags? (And the rest.)
|
|
excoriator
Madrigal Member
nearly a genius
Posts: 37,165
|
Post by excoriator on Dec 4, 2017 22:54:47 GMT
Prescott is welcome to his views. So are you.
|
|